🔗 Share this article

It has been described as a major frauds of its type in the UK.

In all 14 defendants have been found guilty for their role in a £28m conspiracy to defraud more than 3,500 holiday ownership investors.

The affected individuals were keen to exit decades-old vacation property deals and went looking for support.

The majority were in the age range of 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them lost in excess of £10,000, and a single victim transferred over £80,000.

Those victimized were exposed to intense consultations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, owning valueless fake "points" and still trapped in high-priced timeshare contracts they could no longer use.

The Firm Behind the Scam

The company at the core of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They accepted clients' cash to support the owners' opulent standard of living of prestigious schooling, luxury homes and personal aircraft.

The individual at the helm of the company, Mark Rowe, was sentenced to a seven-and-half year jail time in January for fraudulent conspiracy.

In the latest development, his spouse Nicola was part of the concluding cases to learn their fate.

She was given a two-year suspended prison term at the judicial venue after admitting money laundering.

It has been a extended wait and represents a major victory for the individuals who testified, the authorities and prosecutors.

How the Probe Started

I first heard about the company came in the summer of 2016. I was working in the reporting team of a news organization, making documentary programmes.

A friend pointed out that his parent had assumed the rights of a holiday property in a European resort and, after long-term use, had begun looking to terminate the agreement.

It's worth mentioning how widespread holiday ownership had become with English tourists in the last decades of the 20th century.

Timeshares permitted families to occupy the equivalent unit every year, or swap their vacation periods with other owners who had units in different locations. Roughly 600,000 vacation seekers took up that chance.

The initial boom was linked to a numerous stories about rip-off merchants fraudulently marketing units. They became a staple on consumer TV programmes.

The typical timeshare contract locked buyers for long periods.

At that time, those investors who had experienced their assigned property in the sun for decades were getting older, and a large proportion were hoping to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.

Several had health issues and were unable to visit their properties. Others just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had died, in frequent situations leaving their heirs to take over the agreements - along with their regular contributions and maintenance fees.

The Covert Probe Develops

It was at this point the relative had ended up. She browsed the internet for options and found the company, a business whose website assured to release her from her agreement.

However, having submitted funds and scheduled a consultation with them, her relatives became suspicious.

Further research uncovered many victims saying they had handed over cash and got nothing from the service. Indeed, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.

Our team began investigating what was happening. It quickly became clear that there were dubious individuals operating in the holiday ownership market.

One lawyer had numerous client reports preparing to take action against the organization.

Reporters contacted individuals who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They assumed the company would purchase their timeshare from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were informed there was no potential buyers.

Instead, they were encouraged - indeed compelled - to commit further cash acquiring "the firm's incentive scheme", linked to the organization's holding firm, Monster Travel.

The nature of these rewards was not exactly clear. They sounded like a type of exchange medium, offering cheaper vacations and amenities and consumer discounts.

And they were reportedly "exchangeable with fellow investors, at a future date.

Paying cash immediately would result in an future return that would cover SMT's fees and result in the property owner in profit, released finally from their troublesome deal.

An unrealistic promise? Indeed, it was.

A 'Misleading Scheme'

If these accounts were accurate, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

Someone - here the company - "baits" the consumer by marketing a particular product but then to state it cannot be provided, pushing the client in the direction of a different, lower-quality option.

That's illegal. Equipped with all the evidence we had assembled, we made the case to secretly film one of the firm's consultations.

The process requires time, effort, and compelling reasons for why this is the sole method to gather the evidence necessary to confirm deceptive practices.

With approval secured, our limited crew organized a meeting with one of the organization's staff in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Pretending to be a potential client wanting to get his mum free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement