🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Staggering Amount in Compensation from Euroclear over Frozen Assets The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine. The Legal Claim According to accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand. EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial needs. The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves. Divergent Legal Views European Union officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as seizing EU corporate assets within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Strategic Positioning With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States." Euroclear refused to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead While courts in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials indicated they are working on steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also crafting protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would solely be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing conflict. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget. This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."